VI. Decision Making and "Charismatic Authority".
A. "Charismatic Authority" encourages shared decision making, understanding that all members of the Body of Christ are "gifted".
If many individuals and groups have participated in the formulation of the decision, there should be much greater acceptance of the decision by those whom it affects because they had a hand in shaping it and thus are more committed to it than they would be if it were a decision simply handed down by a higher authority.
Why allow people to participate? It is an effectual means of guarding against the introduction of unworthy men into the ministry, and guarding the church against the inroads of error. "The right of suffrage promotes a mutual endearment between pastor and people; leaders must be of "good report".
B. "Charismatic Authority" rests on the persuasion that the individual is competent in all matters of religion. His freedom from priestly direction flows from his competency. So also does his responsibility before God. Such free and competent individuals may bind themselves by covenant into a local church.
God "is present through the Spirit in the community, and the community itself is a community of 'Saints,' of adopted 'sons,' of freely loving persons who have all received 'the seal of the Spirit' (Eph. 1:13) and are 'taught by the Spirit' (I Cor. 2:13). 'He has put his seal upon us,' writes Paul, 'and given us his Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee (arrabon).'" (II Cor. 1:22).
The community is the "body," i.e., the very reality of Christ.
Because the church is a voluntary association, it does not have the authority to dictate, only to influence by persuasion.
"Charismatic Authority" teaches.
"These, then, are the things you should teach (what? the practical lessons of Christian living for elders, youngers, servants, and say 'no' to ungodliness). Encourage and rebuke with all authority. Do not let anyone despise you." (Titus 2:15) (Note the balance between "encourage" and "rebuke".)
Authority is according to the Spirit's gifting; however, it ultimately requires approval of the people served.
"Authority may reside in a position, but unless the person who occupies that position can act legitimately and effectively in the eyes of those around him, he is not viewed as a leader."
"However divine one may be persuaded one's power is, it still is a useless power unless it is accepted by those towards whom it is being directed."
C. Review Biblical accounts of shared decision making:
1. Selection of Judas' successor. Could this have been voting, rather than casting lost? One translation of "gave forth their lots" is, "they cast their votes". Crysostom says, "Peter did everything here with the common consent; nothing, by his own will and authority."
But if so, it followed prayer for divine guidance.
2. The designation of Matthias (Acts 1:15-26) and the Seven (Acts 6:2-4) by the general community served as a paradigm. "Here is affirmed that 'they', meaning the disciples - those addressed as 'men and brethren', appointed two."
3. Selection of "the seven" in Acts 6 included the "multitude". (Notice that the people chose Greek men, and the Jewish Apostles did not veto their choice.) "The proposal pleased the whole multitude, and 'they', i.e. 'the whole multitude'.
4. Concerning Acts 14:23 - "An appointment by two persons is all that can be gathered from the passage. However, the spirit of similar transactions, and the general tenor of the New Testament, forbids the supposition. Even in appointing an apostle, the company of the believers took a prominent part.
5. The Acts 15 "Council" shows a clear involvement of the entire church in the decision making.
Concerning the question raised in Antioch concerning circumcision: "A discussion arose, Paul and Barnabas participated in that discussion, but made no attempt to authoritatively decide it."
6. Acts 15:25 - Judas and Silas were chosen by common consent
7. In I Corinthians 5, Paul does not unilaterally discipline the incestuous man.
"(Paul) has no doubt what it (the church) ought to do, or of his place in its counsels, but he does not seek to by-pass it." Note also the disciplinary process taught by Jesus in Matthew 18; the entire church decides the matter.
8. Representatives were chosen by the churches. (II Corinthians 8:19) "What is more, he was chosen by the churches to accompany us as we carry the offering, which we administer in order to honor the Lord himself and to show our eagerness to help."
There is value in a "multitude of counselors". "Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." (Proverbs 11:14 ) "Plans fail for lack of counsel, but with many advisers they succeed." (Proverbs 15:22)
D. For the fist three centuries, the church operated in a way which honored the people's participation, even in the selection of their leaders (Church history demonstrates the importance of a minister receiving his authority from the people.)
Eusebius reports 'the firm tradition' that the choice of Symeon to succeed James as bishop of Jerusalem (62 A.D.) was by 'unanimous vote of the apostles, disciples, and kinsman of the Lord.'
Ignatius explained that, "cheirotonesantes" was used to refer to church election of a representative.
Clement or Rome (A.D. 96) wrote that apostolic successors should have the consent of all the people.
Tertullian (A.D. 198 or 205) said that elders came into their office 'by the testimony of the people'.
Cyprian (A.D. 249-258), who was largely responsible for the move toward episcopacy, said to the church elders, "I have decided to do nothing of my own opinion privately without your advice and the consent of the people". "A Pastor, should be chosen publicly, in the presence of the people, and that by their decision." (Other historic examples are available up to mid-4th cent.)
The church prior to the Nicea council (325) was loose, connected by a common faith rather than organizational structure. The change was due to the political influence of the times, as well as wholesale baptism.
The larger churches tend to move toward Rational/Legalistic Authority. This may be necessary, but dangerous because greater influence can become "power" and control.
The reformation was an attempt to wrest the church from the dominant use of Rational/Legal authority. Tyndale translated "cheirotonesantes" as "eleccion".
E. Some dangers to avoid:
"Charismatic Authority"
When authority is only "personal" the Pastor may be tempted to please at any price, or on the other hand, be a victim of conflict while trying to be faithful.
If ministers get their authority from the local church members, they could easily be deemed "hirelings".
With "Charismatic Authority", often there's a lack of accountability.
"Rational/Legal Authority"
Often with this typE of authority there is a loss of vitality, leaders become legalistic and harsh, people are evaluated as to how they fit into or fulfill the goals of the organization, rather than according to their giftedness.
"Traditional Authority"
Members become satisfied with the "status quo", not willing to "rock the boat", or on the other hand, do not work to conserve the results (as in Wales).
Conclusion.
1. We want to see all three types integrated, with emphasis according to an understanding of the culture.
2. The dominant type is to be "Charismatic" - speak for God. But elements of the others must at times be employed.
3. Rational/Legal - the church should have a written constitution; proper records should be kept of members, and accounts should be kept properly.
4. Traditional - it is good for leaders to have the respect of the people as an "elder". Furthermore, the wisdom of the elders should be tapped..
5. At what point does it become important to clarify the source of the authority?
When a pastor is being selected for a particular church.
When there is a controversy over doctrine or immorality exposed in the church - i.e. when discipline needs to be exercised.
When legally binding decisions have to me made.
Summary.
1. Be sure of the calling.
2. Be willing to share decision making.
3. Adopt a servant attitude.
4. Become caring as a friend.
5. Be eager to fulfill the "qualities" of a leader.
Additional Points
Apostles addressed letters primarily to the people - not to the leaders:
Rom. 1:7 - To all in Rome who are loved by God and called to be saints; Grace and peace to you from God our Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ.;
I Cor. 1:2 To the church of God in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be holy, together with all those everywhere who call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ-their Lord and ours.
II Cor. 1:1 - Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, to the church of God in Corinth, together with all the saints throughout Achaia;
Gal. 1:2 - To the churches in Galatia;
Eph. 1:1 - Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, to the saints in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus;
Phil 1:1 - Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus, to all the saints in Christ Jesus at Philippi, together with the overseers and deacons: (secondly to overseers and deacons);
Col. 1:2 - To the holy and faithful brothers in Christ a Colosse: Grace and peace to you from God our Father.
I Thess. 1:1 - Paul, Silas and Timothy, to the church of the Thessalonians in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace and peace to you.
II Thess. 1:1 - Paul, Silas and Timothy, to the church of the Thessalonians in God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ -
However, there are exceptions: Timothy and Titus, and in the Revelation letters, which are addressed to the "angel", or "messenger".
Note the development of larger 'city' churches and their proportionate influence -
Though the election of bishop is not to be committed to the multitude, what is meant is that the general population is to be excluded, but not the people of God.
Though the practice may have been uncertain and varied from situation to situation, the ideal enunciated by the papacy was clear: 'no bishop is to be imposed on an unwilling people' and 'one who is to rule over all should be elected by all.'
"Now all voluntary associations have obviously the right of choosing their own officers. It will not be denied that a church is a voluntary society, every member of which is 'individually' accountable to God."
"The Jewish and later Catholic antithesis of clergy and laity has no place in the apostolic age. (Quote from church historian)
"Elders are to be ordained 'in' every Church, not 'over' it." (NIV Acts 14:23 "Paul and Barnabas appointed elders for them in each church and, with prayer and fasting, committed them to the Lord, in whom they had put their trust.")
"If they show themselves approved unto God, workmen that need not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth; they will, ordinarily be approved of man and be esteemed very highly in love for their work's sake. But if not, they can take shelter behind no vote of Presbytery, nor act of Conference, nor Bishop's mandate."
"The power that nurtures and intensifies the community's life is not viewed as coming 'down from above' through levels of clerical mediation but as flowing from the immanent presence of Christ's Spirit to the community."
"Test everything. Hold on to the good" (I Thess. 5:21) Also, "Two or three prophets should speak, and the others should weigh carefully what is said." (I Corinthians 14:29) "Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world." (I John 4:1)
Hebrew. 13:7,17 - "…clearly refers to the relation of the members of a Church to its own Christian teachers, and not to its subordination to any external authority - whether of one or of many."
"Now we ask you, brothers, to respect those who work hard among you, who are over you in the Lord and who admonish you. Hold them in the highest regard in love because of their work. Live in peace with each other." (I Thes. 5:12, 13)
"huperetas" - "anyone who does something under somebody else as a subordinate or an underling."
"doulos" - Peter, Paul, James Jude, characteristic of Christians ( I Pet. 2:16; Rev. 1:1) (used in relation to converts - I Cor. 9:10, li Cor. 4:5)
Many "fight for the throne of authority but not for the towel of servanthood."
Early 20th century Pentecostal emphasis on freedom from structures, creeds or "pope".
Note: if the Spirit gives liberty, to whom does He give it? If He gives it to all, then all are free from the bondage of any other.